Teacher's Say Law Hampers Creativity

January 28, 2010  |  No Comments  |  by Deborah Cahill  |  Calabasas, Calabasas Hills, Calabasas Park Estates, Chatsworth, Classic Calabasas, West Hills

By: Deborah Cahill

school-tests-404b_746348cShare/Bookmark

As a secondary school teacher in California for a number of years and as a classroom teacher for over 25 years I can at “test” to the fact that one of the major complaints teachers have is that we spend far too much time teaching to the test and then taking even more time out from our regular courses of study to complete the tests!  It has gotten to the point where we loose weeks each year on tests which teachers feel are unnecessary and really devalue our time.  As a result, the amount of material we love to teach and which excites the students, and which we have been able to cover, seems to diminish each year.  Here is a brief article that addresses that concern.

California’s Top Teachers Say Law Hampers Classroom Creativity, According To Study.

California’s Press Enterprise (1/26, Straehley) reported, “The best teachers don’t like the effects of the No Child Left Behind act, saying it hampers creativity in the classroom and makes it harder to teach students to love learning,” according to a UC Riverside study published in Policy Matters today. Researchers “surveyed 740 national board certified teachers in California” and “found that 84 percent reported overall unfavorable attitudes about the” law. Many teachers said that “too much class time is devoted to teaching what’s on the state tests, and there’s little time left for creative and fun lessons.” Titled, “Does the No Child Left Behind Act Help or Hinder K-12 Education,” the reports also says that “teachers did see value in the focus and high expectations set by the act, but” did not see NCLB as helping students reach those standards.

EwingSIR does not guarantee information contained in this blog, readers are encouraged not to rely solely on this information and to do their own independent research of facts contained herein. Blog information was obtained from independent sources that we do not endorse, and we do not investigate this information for accuracy.
Share

Ethics in Real Estate Transactions

January 27, 2010  |  No Comments  |  by Gary Krieger  |  Encino, Sherman Oaks, Studio City

By: Gary Krieger

Ethics in Real Estate

Ethics in Real Estate

Share/Bookmark

We hear a lot about the lack of ethics in real estate transactions.  But, does it have to be that way?  I would state categorically NOT.  If one approaches any transaction with good intentions, with the presumption that things will be right, and with the aim of behaving honorably, there is a very good chance that things will go well.  Often time, by acting as one would like to be treated, the other party responds in like kind.

Does ethically mean one should not negotiate ferociously?  No!  Does ethically mean one should roll over if the other party to the transaction is behaving badly?  No!  Does ethically mean one must acquiesce to all the other party’s demands?  Absolutely not!  Negotiation is a process of give and take on key issues.  Often, the mark of a good negotiation is when each side of the transaction comes away feeling that the other side got a little too much.
So, what does ethically mean?  The dictionary defines ethics as, “A set of principles of right conduct.”  I would suggest we can behave according to a set of principles of right conduct and still get great deals.  And, we still leave the same escape clauses in the contracts so that if one finds himself/herself in a transaction with someone who is not behaving in a like manner, one has the ability to cancel the contract and move on.

Let’s keep ethics and morality in real estate transactions!  And, let’s fight like crazy to get extraordinary deals in the process.  These two statements are not mutually exclusive and in fact are quite doable.  The feeling of accomplishing this provides a high level of satisfaction and is often quite long lasting!

EwingSIR does not guarantee information contained in this blog, readers are encouraged not to rely solely on this information and to do their own independent research of facts contained herein. Blog information was obtained from independent sources that we do not endorse, and we do not investigate this information for accuracy.
Share